Bibliometric Analysis of Algebraic Thinking in Early Childhood and Primary Education in Scopus

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem27.5825

Keywords:

Algebra, Bibliometrics, Mathematics, Algebraic thinking, Scientific production
Supporting Agencies
Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) de España, Becas Chile (ANID)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a bibliometric analysis whose objective is to quantify and describe the scientific production of algebraic thinking in early childhood and primary education. We developed this analysis within the Scopus database, as it is one of the databases with the greatest coverage at the level of journals and volume of citations at the international level. We considered the initial open and final search ranges until December 2022. The results show a growing interest in the research community in Didactics of Mathematics in algebraic thinking at these educational levels. We identified authors who have produced a large amount of research on this topic, as well as groups of authors who have collaborated on different papers. In addition, key terms such as early algebra, functional thinking and generalization stand out as prominent topics in this area of study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adamuz-Povedano, N., Jiménez-Fanjul, N., & Maz-Machado, A. (2013). Búsqueda de descriptores que caractericen una disciplina emergente en WoS y SCOPUS: el caso de la Educación Matemática. Biblios: Revista Electrónica de Ciencias de la Información, 50, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5195/BIBLIOS.2013.80

Andini, M., & Prabawanto, S. (2021). Relational thinking in early algebra learning: A systematic literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 012086. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012086

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Becerra, L. D. A. (2014). Estudio bibliométrico sobre uso de métodos y técnicas cua-litativas en investigación publicada en bases de datos de uso común entre el 2011–2013. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología, 7(2), 67–76.

Blanton, M. (2008). Algebra and the elementary classroom: Transforming thinking, transforming practice. Heinemann.

Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. J. (2004). Elementary grade students’ capacity for func-tional thinking. En M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 135–142). PME.

Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2005). Characterizing a classroom practice that pro-motes algebraic reasoning. Journal for research in mathematics education, 36(5), 412-446.

Blanton, M., Brizuela, B. M., Gardiner, A. M., Sawrey, K., & Newman-Owens, A. (2015). A learning trajectory in 6-year-olds’ thinking about generalizing functional relationships. Journal for research in mathematics education, 46(5), 511-558. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.5.0511

Blanton, M., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., Gardiner, A. M., Isler, I., & Kim, J. S. (2015). The development of children’s algebraic thinking: The impact of a compre-hensive early algebra intervention in third grade. Journal for Research in Math-ematics Education, 46(1), 39–87. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0039

Blanton, M., Brizuela, B. M., Gardiner, A. M., Sawrey, K., & Newman-Owens, A. (2017). A progression in first-grade children’s thinking about variable and variable notation in functional relationships. Educational Studies in Mathemat-ics, 95, 181-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9745-0

Bracho-López, R., Torralbo-Rodríguez, M., Maz-Machado, A., & Adamuz-Povedano, N. (2014). Thematic research trends in mathematics education in Spain. Bolema – Mathematics Education Bulletin, 28(50), 1077–1094. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v28n50a04

Brizuela, B. M., Blanton, M., Sawrey, K., Newman-Owens, A., & Murphy Gardiner, A. (2015). Children’s use of variables and variable notation to represent their algebraic ideas. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17(1), 34-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2015.981939

Burgos, M., Beltrán-Pellicer, P., & Godino, J. D. (2018). Pensamiento algebraico temprano de alumnos de quinto de primaria en la resolución de una tarea de proporcionalidad. En L. J. Rodríguez-Muñiz, L. Muñiz-Rodríguez, A. Aguilar González, P. Alonso, F. J. García García, & A. Bruno (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XXII (pp. 181–190). SEIEM.

Cai, J., & Knuth, E. (2011). Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple per-spectives. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4

Callejo, M. L., García-Reche, A., & Fernández, C. (2016). Pensamiento algebraico temprano de estudiantes de educación primaria (6–12 años) en problemas de generalización de patrones lineales. Avances de Investigación en Educación Ma-temática, 10, 5–25. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem.v0i10.106

Cañadas, M. C. (2016). Álgebra escolar: un enfoque funcional. UNO: Revista de Didác-tica de las Matemáticas, 73, 7–13.

Cañadas, M. C. (2023). Una panorámica de las investigaciones sobre pensamiento numérico y pensamiento algebraico. En C. Jiménez-Gestal, Á. A. Magreñán, E. Badillo, & P. Ivars (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XXVI (pp. 3–9). SEIEM.

Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (2018). Cultivating early algebraic thinking. En Teaching and Learning Algebraic Thinking with 5-to 12-Year-Olds (pp. 107–138). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68351-5_5

Carraher, D. W., Martinez, M. V., & Schliemann, A. D. (2008). Early algebra and mathematical generalization. ZDM, 40, 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0067-7

Castro, E. (2012). Dificultades en el aprendizaje del álgebra escolar. En A. Estepa, Á. Contreras, J. Deulofeu, M. C. Penalva, F. J. García, & L. Ordóñez (Eds.), Investi-gación en Educación Matemática XVI (pp. 75–94). SEIEM.

Chimoni, M., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Christou, C. (2018). Examining early algebraic thinking: Insights from empirical data. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98, 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9803-x

Donoghue, E. F. (2001). Mathematics education in the United States: Origins of the field and the development of early graduate programs. En R. Reys & J. Kilpat-rick (Eds.), One field, many paths: US Doctoral programs in mathematics educa-tion. American Mathematical Society. https://doi.org/10.1090/cbmath/009/01

Eck, N. J. V., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analy-sis of some well‐known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1635–1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21075

Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weak-nesses. The FASEB journal, 22(2), 338-342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF

Fuentes, S., & Cañadas, M. C. (2022). Evidencias de pensamiento funcional en una niña de 4 años: Estrategias y representaciones. En T. F. Blanco, C. Núñez-García, M. C. Cañadas, & J. A. González-Calero (Eds.), Investigación en Educa-ción Matemática XXV (pp. 269–276). SEIEM.

Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 257-276). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_12

Goñi-Cervera, J., Cañadas, M. C., & Polo-Blanco, I. (2022). Generalisation in stu-dents with autism spectrum disorder: an exploratory study of strategies. ZDM, 54(6), 1333-1347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01415-w

Hidalgo-Moncada, D., & Cañadas, M. C. (2020). Intervenciones en el trabajo con una tarea de generalización que involucra las formas directa e inversa de una fun-ción en sexto de primaria. PNA, 14(3), 204–225. https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v14i3.11378

Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Battey, D. (2007). Profes-sional development focused on children’s algebraic reasoning in elementary school. Journal for research in mathematics education, 38(3), 258-288.

Jiménez-Fanjul, N., Adamuz-Povedano, N., Maz-Machado, A., Bracho-López, R., Lupiáñez, J. L., & Segovia, I. (2011). Producción científica internacional en educación matemática en SSCI y SCOPUS (1980–2009): Construcción de des-criptores. En J. L. Lupiáñez, M. C. Cañadas, M. Molina, M. Palarea, & A. Maz (Eds.), Investigaciones en Pensamiento Numérico y Algebraico e Historia de la Matemática y Educación Matemática 2011 (pp. 325–335). Universidad de Gra-nada.

Kaput, J. J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? En J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 5–17). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315097435-2

Kieran, C. (1996). The changing face of school algebra. En C. Alsina, J. Álvarez, B. Hodgson, C. Laborde, & A. Pérez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international con-gress on mathematical education: Selected lectures (pp. 271–290). SAEM Thales.

Kieran, C. (2004). Algebraic thinking in the early grades: What is it. The Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 139–151.

Kieran, C. (2022). The multi-dimensionality of early algebraic thinking: Back-ground, overarching dimensions, and new directions. ZDM, 54(6), 1131-1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01435-6

Kriegler, S. (2007). Just what is algebraic thinking? Mathematics Teaching in the Mid-dle School, 13(8), 430–435.

Lee, K., Ng, E. L., & Ng, S. F. (2009). The contributions of working memory and ex-ecutive functioning to problem representation and solution generation in al-gebraic word problems. Journal of educational psychology, 101(2), 373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013843

Lins, R., & Kaput, J. J. (2004). The early development of algebraic reasoning: The current state of the field. En K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra. Proceedings of the 12th ICMI study confer-ence (pp. 47–70). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8131-6_4

Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2021). Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Sci-ence, and OpenCitations’ COCI: A multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics, 126(1), 871–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4

Mason, J., & Pimm, D. (1984). Generic examples: Seeing the general in the particu-lar. Educational studies in mathematics, 15, 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312078

Maz, A., Torralbo, M., Hidalgo, M., & Bracho-López, R. (2009). Los simposios de la Sociedad Española de Investigación en Educación Matemática: Una revisión bibliométrica. En M. J. González, M. T. González, & J. Murillo (Eds.), Investiga-ción en Educación Matemática XIII (pp. 323–331). SEIEM.

Merino, E., Cañadas, M. C., & Molina, M. (2013). Uso de representaciones y patrones por alumnos de quinto de educación primaria en una tarea de generalización. Edma 0–6: Educación Matemática en la Infancia, 2(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.24197/edmain.1.2013.24-40

Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217544

Ministerio de Educación (MINEDUC). (2012). Bases curriculares Primero a Sexto Bási-co. Chile.

Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional. (2022). Real decreto 157/2022, de 1 de marzo, por el que se establecen la ordenación y las enseñanzas mínimas de la Educación Primaria. BOE, 52, 24386–24504.

Molina, M. (2007). La integración del pensamiento algebraico en educación prima-ria. En M. Camacho, P. Flores, & M. P. Bolea (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática (pp. 53–70). SEIEM.

Molina, M. (2009). Una propuesta de cambio curricular: Integración del pensa-miento algebraico en educación primaria. PNA, 3(3), 135–156.

Narváez, R., & Cañadas, M. C. (2023). Mediaciones realizadas a estudiantes de se-gundo de primaria en una tarea de generalización. PNA, 17(3), 239–264. https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v17i3.24153

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and stand-ards for school mathematics. Autor.

Papic, M. M., Mulligan, J. T., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (2011). Assessing the develop-ment of preschoolers’ mathematical patterning. Journal for Research in Math-ematics Education, 42(3), 237-268. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.3.0237

Pinto, E., Cañadas, M. C., & Moreno, A. (2022). Functional relationships evidenced and representations used by third graders within a functional approach to early algebra. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(6), 1183–1202.

Radford, L. (2000). Signs and meanings in students’ emergent algebraic thinking: A semiotic analysis. Educational studies in mathematics, 42, 237-268. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017530828058

Radford, L. (2008). Iconicity and contraction: A semiotic investigation of forms of algebraic generalizations of patterns in different contexts. ZDM, 40(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0061-0

Radford, L. (2014). The progressive development of early embodied algebraic think-ing. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26, 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0087-2

Reys, R. E., & Kilpatrick, J. (2001). One field, many paths: US Doctoral programs in Mathematics Education (Vol. 9). American Mathematical Society. https://doi.org/10.1090/cbmath/009/01

Scopus. (S/f). Recuperado el 21 de abril de 2023, de http://www.scopus.com/

Sibgatullin, I. R., Korzhuev, A. V., Khairullina, E. R., Sadykova, A. R., Baturina, R. V., & Chauzova, V. (2022). A systematic review on algebraic thinking in education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), em2065. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11486

Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal cover-age of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scien-tometrics, 126(6), 5113–5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5

Stephens, A., Blanton, M., Knuth, E., Isler, I., & Gardiner, A. M. (2015). Just say yes to early algebra! Teaching Children Mathematics, 22(2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.22.2.0092

Torres, M. D., Cañadas, M. C., & Moreno, A. (2019). Estructuras y representaciones de alumnos de 2º de primaria en una aproximación funcional del pensamiento algebraico. En J. M. Marbán, M. Arce, A. Maroto, J. M. Muñoz-Escolano, & Á. Alsina (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XXIII (pp. 573–582). SEIEM.

Vallejo-Ruiz, M. (2005). Estudio longitudinal de la producción española de tesis docto-rales en Educación Matemática (1975–2002) [Tesis doctoral sin publicar]. Uni-versidad de Granada.

Ventura, A. C., Brizuela, B. M., Blanton, M., Sawrey, K., Gardiner, A. M., & Newman-Owens, A. (2021). A learning trajectory in kindergarten and first grade stu-dents’ thinking of variable and use of variable notation to represent indeter-minate quantities. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 62, 100866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100866

Vukovic, R. K., & Lesaux, N. K. (2013). The language of mathematics: Investigating the ways language counts for children’s mathematical development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(2), 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.02.002

Warren, E., & Cooper, T. (2008). Generalising the pattern rule for visual growth pat-terns: Actions that support 8 year olds’ thinking. Educational Studies in mathe-matics, 67, 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9092-2

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Downloads

Published

2025-05-02

How to Cite

Narváez, R., Adamuz-Povedano, N., & Cañadas, M. C. (2025). Bibliometric Analysis of Algebraic Thinking in Early Childhood and Primary Education in Scopus. Advances of Research in Mathematics Education, (27), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem27.5825

Issue

No. 27 (2025)

Section

Artículos

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Romina Narváez, Natividad Adamuz-Povedano, María C. Cañadas

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The articles published in this journal are under a license Creative Commons: By 4.0 España from  number 21 (2022).

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and keep the acknowledgement of authorship.
  2. The texts published in this journal are – unless indicated otherwise – covered by the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international licence. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s). The full text of the licence can be consulted here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Funding data