Analysis of Spatial Sense in Secondary School Students in PISA Activities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem27.6538Keywords:
Evaluation, Geometry, Spatial sense, Visualization, PISAAbstract
This article analyzes the components of spatial sense in solving activities proposed by PISA. For that purpose, categories are established that allow identifying the manifestations of the spatial sense of 122 15-year-old students who are in the first year of Uruguayan high school when solving the PISA activities and are related to the performance achieved in the classroom tests proposed by their teachers. From the correlation analysis, relationships are obtained between performance and visualization skills and the management of geometric concepts in some activities. It is evident that those who present a better performance in the evaluation implemented by the teachers tend to have a greater manifestation of the spatial sense in the PISA activities. The spatial sense required in the PISA activity that best predicts the performance achieved by students in the evaluation implemented by the teachers is also described.
2.11.0.0Downloads
References
Administración Nacional de Educación Pública (ANEP). (2023). Uruguay en PISA 2022. Informes de resultados. División de Investigación, Evaluación y Estadística. Autor.
Consejo de Educación Secundaria (CES). (2020). Orientaciones vinculadas con la eva-luación de los aprendizajes: La calificación. ANEP.
Del Grande, J. (1990). Spatial sense. The Arithmetic Teacher, 37(6), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.37.6.0014
Dhlamini, Z. B., Chuene, K., Masha, K., & Kibirige, I. (2019). Exploring grade nine geometry spatial mathematical reasoning in the South African annual nation-al assessment. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Educa-tion, 15(11), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/105481
Elvas, I., Ramírez, R., & Flores, P. (2022). Habilidades de visualización en las eva-luaciones escritas en secundaria. En T. F. Blanco, C. Núñez-García, M. C. Ca-ñadas, & J. A. González-Calero (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XXIV (pp. 249-257). SEIEM.
Firmansyah, F. F., Sunardi, Susanto, E. Y., & Ambarwati, R. (2019). The uniqueness of visual levels in resolving geometry of shape and space content based on van Hieles’s theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1211(1), 1-8. IOP Publish-ing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1211/1/012076
Flores, P., Ramírez, R., & del Río, A. (2015). Sentido espacial. En P. Flores & L. Rico (Coords.), Enseñanza y aprendizaje de las matemáticas en educación primaria (pp. 127-146). Pirámide.
Gutiérrez, A. (1996). Visualization in 3-dimensional geometry: In search of a framework. En L. Puig & A. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th PME con-ference, 1 (pp. 3-19). Universidad de Valencia.
Jones, K., & Tzekaki, M. (2016). Research on the teaching and learning of geometry. En Á. Gutiérrez, G. C. Leder, & P. Boero (Eds.), The second handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 109–149). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-561-6_4
Mix, K. S., Levine, S. C., Cheng, Y. L., Stockton, J. D., & Bower, C. (2020). Effects of spatial training on mathematics in first and sixth grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000494
Möhring, W., Ribner, A., Segerer, R., Libertus, M., Kahl, T., Troesch, L., & Grob, A. (2021). Developmental trajectories of children’s spatial skills: Influencing variables and associations with later mathematical thinking. En L. Malmberg (Ed.), Learning and Instruction, 75, 1-10. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101515
Murtiyasa, B., Rejeki, S., Setyaningsih, R., & Merdekawati, A. (2019). Students’ thinking in solving geometric problems based on PISA levels. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1320(1), 1-7. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012068
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and stand-ards for school mathematics. Autor.
Novitasari, D., Nasrullah, A., Triutami, T. W., Apsari, R. A., & Silviana, D. (2021). High level of visual-spatial intelligence’s students in solving PISA geometry problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 1-9. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1778/1/012003
Ortiz, A., & Sandoval, I. (2018). Representaciones de cuerpos geométricos: Una ex-periencia con profesores de primaria de Latinoamérica. En L. J. Rodríguez-Muñiz, L. Muñiz-Rodríguez, A. Aguilar-González, P. Alonso, F. J. García, & A. Bruno (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XXII (pp. 427-436). SEI-EM.
Presmeg, N. C. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathe-matics. En Á. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psycholo-gy of mathematics education. Past, present and future (pp. 205-236). Sense Pub-lishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901127_009
Riastuti, N., Mardiyana, M., & Pramudya, I. (2017). Students’ errors in geometry viewed from spatial intelligence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 1-6. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012029
Rico, L. (2012). Aproximación a la investigación en didáctica de la matemática. Avances de Investigación en Educación Matemática, 1, 39–63. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem.v1i1.4
Rico, L., & Fernández, A. (2013). Análisis didáctico y metodología de investigación. En L. Rico, J. L. Lupiáñez, & M. Molina (Coords.), Análisis didáctico en educación matemática (pp. 1-22). Comares.
Sáenz, C., & Bruno, G. (2018). Calibración, autoconcepto y competencia matemática. Avances de Investigación en Educación Matemática, 14, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem.v0i14.178
Suurtamm, C., Thompson, D. R., Kim, R. Y., Moreno, L. D., Sayac, N., Schukajlow, S., Silver, E., Ufer, S., & Vos, P. (2016). Assessment in mathematics education: Large-scale assessment and classroom assessment (pp. 27-33). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32394-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 María Isabel Elvas Fernández, Rafael Ramírez Uclés

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles published in this journal are under a license Creative Commons: By 4.0 España from number 21 (2022).
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and keep the acknowledgement of authorship.
- The texts published in this journal are – unless indicated otherwise – covered by the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international licence. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s). The full text of the licence can be consulted here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Funding data
-
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Grant numbers PID2020-117395RB-I00