Towards a socio-ecological practice of mathematics teacher education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem23.5489

Keywords:

Socio-ecological, Mathematics teacher education, Teacher education, Futures (of society), Ethics

Abstract

This theoretical article is a response to UNESCO’s call for a new social contract for education, in the context of mathematics teacher education. The article sets out four principles behind “socio-ecological” practices in mathematics education: not taking nature as a fixed background for concerns; avoiding the epistemological error of taking the individual as the unit of learning; questioning what is centred in our work; moving towards a dialogic ethics. The article considers the “what” and the “how” of mathematics teacher education, from this socio-ecological perspective. In terms of the “how”, it is argued a dialogic ethics prompts attention to the potential for a mathematics teacher educator taking a “meta-perspective” in relationships with prospective teachers, recognising those prospective teachers as “teachers”, from the start of a teacher education course. In contexts where the “what” of mathematics teacher education is highly constrained, the “how” of socio-ecological practices may still be possible to enact.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abtahi, Y., Gotze, P., Steffensen, L., Hauge, K. H., and Barwell, R. (2017). Teaching climate change in mathematics classrooms: An ethical responsibility. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 32. https://education.exeter.ac.uk/research/centres/stem/publications/pmej/pome32/index.html

Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act (Eds. V. Liapunov & M. Holquist; Trans. V. Liapunov). University of Texas Press.

Barwell, R., Boylan, M. & Coles, A. (2022). Mathematics education and the living world: a dialogic response to a global crisis. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 68, 101013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.101013

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. University of Chicago Press, 2000.

Boons, F. (2013). Organizing Within Dynamic Ecosystems: Conceptualizing Socio-Ecological Mechanisms. Organization & Environment 26(3), 281–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026613498755.

Boylan, M. (2016). Ethical dimensions of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(3), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9678-z

Boylan, M., & Coles, A. (2017). Is another mathematics education possible? An introduction to a Special Issue on “Mathematics Education and the living world: Responses to ecological crisis”. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 32. https://education.exeter.ac.uk/research/centres/stem/publications/pmej/pome32/index.html

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). Ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.

Brown, J., Brown, L., Coles, A. & Helliwell, T. (2020). Learning to teach mathematics: The lesson de-brief conversation. In, O. Chapman (Ed.), The International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education: Volume 2: Tools and processes in Mathematics Teacher Education (pp. pp.85-109). Sense Publishers.

Brown, J., Brown, L., Coles, A. & Helliwell, T. (2021). Working with awareness as Mathematics Teacher Educators: Experiences to issues to actions. In M. Goos and K. Beswick (Eds.), The Learning and Development of Mathematics Teacher Educators: International Perspectives and Challenges (pp. 187-204). Springer.

Brown, J., Coles, A., Hayward, R., Helliwell, T., Lustig-Bruce, D., Owen, E., & Salt, A. (2021). Mathematics teaching and global challenges: Part one. Mathematics Teaching, 276, 9-12.

Brown, J., Coles, A., Helliwell, T., James, I., Kurian, H., Läderach, J., Morris, L. & Sebe, I. (2021). Mathematics teaching and global challenges: Part 2. Mathematics Teaching, 277, 11-13.

Coles, A. (2020). Communicating ‘nots’: A journey in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 40(0), 15-20. https://flm-journal.org/index.php?do=show&lang=en&vol=40&num=0

Coles, A. (2022). A socio-ecological turn in mathematics education: Reflecting on curriculum innovation. Paradigma, 43(1), 207-228.

https://doi.org/10.37618/PARADIGMA.1011-2251.2022.p207-228.id1168

Coles, A., & Helliwell, T. (2023). The role of mathematics teacher educators in preparing teachers of mathematics to respond to global challenges within their classrooms. London Review of Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.21.1.02

Coles, A., le Roux, K., & Solares-Rojas, A. (2022). Towards a socio-ecological perspective of mathematics education. In: C. Fernández, et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 45th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 171-178). Alicante: PME, Vol. 2.

Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia: Eight lectures on the new climatic regime. Polity.

Levinas, E. (2011). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. Springer.

Louie, N., & Zhan, W.-Y. (2022). A Socio-Ecological Framework for Research in Mathematics Education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(5), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2022-0003

Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1992). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding (Rev. ed). Shambhala.

Murray, J. (2000). Bakhtinian answerability and Levinasian responsibility: Forging a fuller dialogic communicative ethics. Southern Journal of Communication, 65(2–3), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940009373163

OECD (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills, 2030 OECD Learning Compass 2030: A Series of Concept Notes. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/learning-compass-2030/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdf

Oishi, S., & Graham, J. (2010). Social Ecology: Lost and Found in Psychological Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 356–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610374588

Radford, L. (2021). The theory of objectification: A Vygotskian perspective on knowing and becoming in mathematics teaching and learning. Brill.

Roe, J., deForest, R., & Jamshidi, S. (2018). Mathematics for Sustainability. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76660-7

Savard, A. (2017). Implementing inquiry-based learning situation in science and technology: What are elementary school teachers’ learning intensions and mathematics? Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 32. https://education.exeter.ac.uk/research/centres/stem/publications/pmej/pome32/index.html

Solares-Rojas, A., Arellano-Aguilar, O., García González, M., López-Vargas, A., Coles, A., & Méndez, A. (2022). Mathematics education and social-environmental crises. Research in Mathematics Education 24(2), https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2022.2062781

UNESCO (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Educational and Cultural Organization of the United Nations. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707

Valero, P. (2004). Socio-political perspectives on mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education (pp. 5–23). Kluwer.

Varela F. J. (1999). Steps to a science of interbeing: Unfolding the dharma implicit in modern cognitive science. In: G. Watson, S. Bachelor & G. Claxton (Eds.), The psychology of awakening (pp. 71–89). Rider. https://cepa.info/4118

Wolfe, C. (2020). What “The Animal” Can Teach “The Anthropocene”. Angelaki, 25(3), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2020.1754033

Wilden, A. (2001). System and structure: Essays in communication and exchange (2nd. ed.; Reproduction of the ed. London 1972). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-28

How to Cite

Coles, A. (2023). Towards a socio-ecological practice of mathematics teacher education. Advances of Research in Mathematics Education, (23), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem23.5489