A theoretical exploration: Zone of Proximal Development as an ethical zone for teaching mathematics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem20.4038Keywords:
ZPD, power, ethics, responsibilities, mathematics learning and teachingAbstract
For decades, Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) has been utilized as an important theoretical framework for exploring and analysing the concept of learning, but its implications for teachers remain much less explored. In this article, I conceptualise some of the roots of Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory of learning and, on this basis, I explore the ZPD as an ethical and powerful zone for teaching. Together with providing a thorough description of some key aspects of Vygotsky’s theoretical concepts, the major question stated, What are the ethical responsibilities of teachers to guide students do mathematics that is beyond their independent ability? intends to open up an original line of inquiry. I first give an overview of this learning theory, as it stemmed from Marxism, my means of supporting examples from mathematics education research literature. It follows a discussion on the issue of ethics and responsibility to more explicitly highlight the ethical responsibilities and power of teachers that are implicit in the concept of ZPD.
Downloads
References
Abtahi, Y. (in press). What if I was harmful? Reflecting on the ethical tensions associated with teaching the dominant mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics.
Abtahi, Y. (2016). Things kids think with: The role of physical properties of the mathematical tools in children’s learning (of the addition of fractions). University of Ottawa Publishing. 1-201. https://ruor.uottawa.ca/bitstream/10393/35265/1/Abtahi_Yasaman_2016_Thesis.pdf
Abtahi, Y. (2017a). The ‘more knowledgeable other’: A necessity in the zone of proximal development? For the Learning of Mathematics. 37(1), 20-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2017.1390691
Abtahi. Y. (2017b). Children, tools and the zone of proximal development. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2017.1390691
Abtahi, Y., Graven, M., & Lerman, S. (2017). Conceptualising the more knowledgeable other within a multi-directional ZPD. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96, 275-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9768-1
Atweh, B., & Brady, K. (2009). Socially response-able mathematics education: Implications of an ethical approach. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(3), 267-276. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75278
Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artefacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. D. English, & D. Kirshner (eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 746-783). Routledge.
Boylan, M. (2016). Ethical dimensions of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92, 395-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9678-z
Burbules, N. C., & Warnick, B. R. (2006). Phylosophical inquiry. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 489-502). Routledge.
Civil, M., & Planas, N. (2004). Participation in the mathematics classroom: Does every student have a voice? For the Learning of Mathematics, 24(1), 7-12.
Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., & Souberman, E. (1978). Biographical note on L. S. Vygotsky. Mind in society the development of higher psychological processes (pp. 1-15). Harvard University Press.
D’Ambrosio, U. (2010). Mathematics education and survival with dignity. In H. Alrø, P. Valero, & O. Ravn (Eds.), Critical mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 51-63). Brill/Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460911644_006
Empson, S. B. (1999). Equal sharing and shared meaning: The development of fraction concepts in a first-grade classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 17(3), 283-342. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1703_3
Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303-328). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809989.020
Goos, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 193-223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016209010120
Lerman, S. (2013). Learning and knowing mathematics. In P. Andrews, & T. Rowland (eds), Masterclass in mathematics education: International perspectives on teaching and learning (pp. 15-26). Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350284807.ch-002
Lerman, S. & Meira, L. (2001). The zone of proximal development as a symbolic space. South Bank University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Science.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1988). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844 and the Communist Manifesto [Trans. M. Milligan]. Prometheus. (Original work published 1930)
Planas, N., & Civil, M. (2009). Working with mathematics teachers and immigrant students: An empowerment perspective. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(6), 391-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9116-1
Ricœur, J. P. G. (1973). Ethics and culture. Philosophy Today, 17(2), 153-165. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday197317235
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press.
Rorty, R. (2009). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400833061
Roth, W.-M. (2007). Solidarity and the ethics of collaborative research. In S. Ritchie (ed.), Research collaboration: Relationships and praxis (pp. 27-42). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903138_004
Roth, W.-M. (2013). Toward a post-constructivist ethics in/of teaching and learning. Pedagogies. An International Journal, 8(2), 103-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2013.767769
Roth, W.-M. (2018). A transactional approach to research ethics. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(3), 100-112
Roth, W.-M., & Radford, L. (2010). Re/thinking the zone of proximal development (symmetrically). Mind, Culture and Activity, 17(4), 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749031003775038
Van Oers, B. (1996). Learning mathematics as a meaningful activity. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin, & B. Greer (eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 91-113). Routledge.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes [Eds. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman]. Harvard University Press.
Walshaw, M. (2017). Understanding mathematical development through Vygotsky. Research in Mathematics Education, 19(3), 293-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2017.1379728
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press.
Yasnitsky, A., & Van der Veer, R. (eds.) (2015). Revisionist revolution in Vygotsky studies: The state of the art. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714240
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The articles published in this journal are under a license Creative Commons: By 4.0 España from number 21 (2022).
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and keep the acknowledgement of authorship.
- The texts published in this journal are – unless indicated otherwise – covered by the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international licence. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s). The full text of the licence can be consulted here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
