A progression of student symbolizing: Solutions to systems of linear equations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem21.4237Keywords:
Systems of linear equations, Linear algebra, Symbolizing, Student reasoning, Realistic Mathematics EducationAbstract
Systems of linear equations (SLE) comprise a fundamental concept in linear algebra, but there is relatively little research regarding the teaching and learning of SLE, especially students' conceptions of solutions. It has been shown that solving systems with no or infinitely many solutions tends to be less intuitive for students, pointing to the need for more research on the teaching and learning of the topic. We interviewed two mathematics majors who were also preservice teachers, in a paired teaching experiment to see how they reasoned about solutions to SLE in ℝ3. We present findings focused on the progression of students’ reasoning about solutions to SLE through the lens of symbolizing. We document their progression of reasoning as an accumulation of coordinated numeric, algebraic, and graphical meanings and symbolizations for solution sets.
Downloads
References
Andrews-Larson, C. J., Siefken, J., & Simha, R. (2022). Report on a US-Canadian faculty survey on undergraduate linear algebra: Could linear algebra be an alternate first collegiate math course? Notices of the American Mathematical Society.
Freudenthal, H. (1973). What groups mean in mathematics and what they should mean in mathematical education. In A.G. Howson (Ed.), Developments in Mathematical Education: Proceedings of the Second International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 101-114). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013536.006
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. Kluwer Academic.
Gravemeijer, K. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(2), 155-177. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0102_4
Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003749919816
Harel, G. (2017). The learning and teaching of linear algebra: Observations and generalizations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 46, 69-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.02.007
Huntley, M. A., Marcus, R., Kahan, J., & Miller, J. L. (2007). Investigating high-school students’ reasoning strategies when they solve linear equations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 115-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.05.005
Larson, C., & Zandieh, M. (2013). Three interpretations of the matrix equation Ax= b. For the Learning of Mathematics, 33(2), 11-17.
Oktaç, A. (2018). Conceptions about system of linear equations and solution. In S. Stewart, C. Andrews-Larson, A. Berman, & M. Zandieh (Eds.), Challenges and strategies in teaching linear algebra (pp. 71–101). Springer.
Possani, E., Trigueros, M., Preciado, J.G., & Lozano, M. D. (2010). Use of models in the teaching of linear algebra. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 432, 2125-2140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2009.05.004
Rasmussen, C., & Marrongelle, K. (2006). Pedagogical content tools: Integrating student reasoning and mathematics in instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(5), 388-420.
Rasmussen, C., Wawro, M. & Zandieh, M. (2015). Examining individual and collective level mathematical progress. Education Studies in Mathematics, 88(2), 259-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9583-x
Rasmussen, C., Zandieh, M., King, K. & Teppo, A. (2005). Advancing mathematical activity: A practice-oriented view of advanced mathematical thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7, 51-73. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0701_4
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
Sandoval, I. & Possani, E. (2016). An analysis of different representations for vectors and planes in R3: Learning challenges. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92, 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9675-2
Smith, J., Lee, I., Zandieh, M., & Andrews-Larson, C. (2021). Two students’ conceptions of solutions to a system of linear equations. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education.
Smith, J., & Thompson, P. W. (2007). Quantitative reasoning and the development of algebraic reasoning. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 95-132). Erlbaum
Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-307). Erlbaum.
Wawro, M., Zandieh, M., Rasmussen, C., & Andrews-Larson, C. (2013). Inquiry oriented linear algebra: Course materials. http://iola.math.vt.edu
Zandieh, M. & Andrews-Larson, C. (2019). Symbolizing while solving linear systems. ZDM, 51, 1183-1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01083-3
Zandieh, M., Wawro, M., & Rasmussen, C. (2017). An example of inquiry in linear algebra: The roles of symbolizing and brokering, PRIMUS, 27(1), 96-124, https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2016.1199618
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jessica L. Smith, Inyoung Lee, Michelle Zandieh, Christine Andrews-Larson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles published in this journal are under a license Creative Commons: By 4.0 España from number 21 (2022).
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and keep the acknowledgement of authorship.
- The texts published in this journal are – unless indicated otherwise – covered by the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international licence. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s). The full text of the licence can be consulted here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
